The Virginia judge who ruled the state’s “universal” background scheme was an unconstitutional violation of equal protection laws is set to hear arguments in two competing motions on Wednesday; one from the plaintiffs in the ligitation who say the head of the Virginia State Police should be held in contempt for resuming the background checks even though an injunction against enforcement remains in place, and a competing motion from anti-gun Attorney General Jay Jones, who argues the injunction should be dissolved but has also been rendered moot through a new piece of gun control legislation.